The split-captaincy system has been a hot subject in Indian cricket given that the Indian team failed to win the 2022 T20 World Cup in Australia. Require all-rounder Hardik Pandya to change Rohit Sharma as T20I captain have been growing. With Rohit taking a break, Pandya is leading the men in blue in the recurring T20I collection in New Zealand.

According to the most recent records, the Indian group prepares to share the captaincy job. Evidently, when the new senior guys’s selection board changes the one sacked on Friday, November 18, it will be encouraged to pick captains in all three styles – a hint that the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) may have accepted the numerous captaincy concept.

In all likelihood, Rohit will certainly stay accountable of the Test as well as ODI teams, while Pandya will certainly captain the T20I group up until the 2024 T20 World Cup in the West Indies and also the USA.

Among the leading international cricket teams, England, Australia, Sri Lanka as well as South Africa comply with a split captaincy plan. On the other hand, India, New Zealand and Pakistan follow the teaching of “one captain for all formats”. With the growing discussion regarding split captaincy in Indian cricket, we take another look at the thoughts of three of the greats of Indian cricket who have actually opposed the idea in the past.

Split captaincy does not operate in India – MS Dhoni

In introducing his decision to step down as captain of the Indian limited-overs competition in 2017 as well as hand over the baton to Virat Kohli, MS Dhoni aptly stated his views on split captaincy. He believes that a split captaincy system will not work in India.

” I don’t count on a split captaincy system. For the group, there has to be just one leader. A split captaincy will not work in India and I am waiting for the correct time. I want Kohli to alleviate right into the work. There are no incorrect decisions in this. This group has the prospective to carry out well in all three layouts. I believe this is the right time to carry on.”

Dhoni gave up the Test captaincy throughout the 2014 tour of Australia. He claimed he intended to reduce Kohli into a long-lasting setting role prior to putting him in charge of the white team.” I believe it is crucial that a player leads the group. When Virat Kohli took over as Test captain, I had that in mind. I desired him to take control of and also ease right into the job.” Kohli was the overall captain of the Indian team up until he stepped down as T20I captain after the T20 World Cup in UAE in 2015.

All formats should coincide captain – VVS Laxman

Like Dhoni, previous India batsman VVS Laxman had claimed in March in 2015 that it would be a lot more helpful for the team to have one captain in all styles of the game.Laxman shared his thoughts in an interview when Kohli was still the leader and the argument concerning the captaincy division was obtaining heated.

” I have always believed that as long as your captain is not burdened by the captaincy and he is a person that enjoys the responsibility without it influencing his efficiency, in this instance batsman Virat, if he is a normal in all three styles, after that the captain of all formats ought to coincide individual.”

On England’s success with different captains in different styles, he clarified that their situation is totally various from that of India. “In England, the split captaincy system functioned due to the fact that Joe Root (the Test captain that year) was not a normal in white-ball cricket, or Eoin Morgan (who was the white-ball captain) was not a Test gamer. If a captain is a gamer in all 3 formats and an entertainer on top of that, after that it must be a captain.”

Two CEOs assigned in one company? – Kapil Dev

A couple of years ago, India’s 1983 World Cup champion signed up with the debate on split captains, voicing his opposition to the concept, claiming it violated the culture of Indian cricket. Replying to former opener Gautam Gambhir’s phone call to split captaincy duties, Kapil asked whether a firm can have two CEOs. he was quoted in media records.

” In our culture, that’s not mosting likely to happen. Would you have 2 CEOs in one company? No, 80%, 70% of our teams coincide team. When captains have different concepts, they do not like it. If you have 2 captains, the players may believe he will be my captain in the test and that may bring even more dispute.”